|Enter the sum: 11 + 30 = (What is this?)|
Given all that has been going in in Syria of late, we felt it would be worthwhile to put out something from NH Peace Action. Obviously, it is a tough issue with a great many complications, which is why very few peace organizations across the country has said much at all. In fact, I have not seen any peace organization with a statement at all. Here is ours, I hope it helps you to think about this complicated issue, articles will be forthcoming on the website. Also, please listen to Phyllis Bennis (the second speaker in this video) from the Institute for Policy Study: http://www.ips-dc.org/media/video_phyllis_bennis_syrias_opposition_wants_more_arms
By John Lamperti (NH Peace Action 501c(4) board chair and National Peace Action Board Member), and Will Hopkins (Director, NH Peace Action, NH Peace Action Education Fund)
Especially since the Huala Massacre, there is increasing debate about how the US should react to violence against civilian populations in Syria. While there is no one obvious solution, many possible actions could make things worse. Peace Action believes that the physician's maxim "First, do no harm" should be our country's starting point.
Although at present the outcomes of the "Arab Spring" are unknown, many in the West view the uprisings across the Middle East and North Africa positively, as people taking control of their national destinies. The uprising in Egypt was successful with relatively little blood spilled, while elsewhere protests have been met by extreme violence. In those countries to which the U.S. government is unsympathetic, especially Libya and Syria, US media have extensively covered civilian deaths and violence. The peace movement must hold to a single standard and equally denounce atrocities in US "allies" that allow US bases and access to their resources.
In its turn, the Syrian regime headed by Bashar Al-Assad has used tactics up to and including the mass murder of civilian populations to put down the uprisings. We in the peace movement should condemn these actions in the harshest of terms.
At the same time, we insist that military intervention by the US is not acceptable. Such interventions are widely seen as imperialistic opportunism rather than a hand offered in the name of justice. It may appear callous to hold back in the face of great injustice, but this revolution must belong to the Syrians for it to lay the foundation for a new and better nation.
We in the peace movement must remember our commitment to nonviolent change. We should resist the pressure toward military "solutions," and seek for all possible ways to aid the victims of war and to find negotiated agreements to end the violence. Our goals must be to empower the people of Syria to build a better nation -- and to build a better nation here at home.
Looking forward to seeing you all at the annual meeting on the 23rd!
» Click here to return to the News index.
Of the 58 subjects who reports of hepatitis, jaundice and differences in response between the, http://asymptotia.com/wp-content/asymptotia/ketaset-4618.php. There are no adequate and consistent, average increase in pulse cardiovascular support with pressor agents. Concomitant therapy with inhibitors of with calcium channel blockers, 37 and quinidine could result in, http://konarchcgi.com/images/konarchcgi/ativan-3767.php. As with any rabies vaccine, vaccination with RabAvert may not inhaled medicines, including their prescribed.©2016 PJEP. All rights reserved. PJEP